Showing newest 12 of 20 posts from November 2008. Show older posts
Showing newest 12 of 20 posts from November 2008. Show older posts

Friday, November 28, 2008

The Daniel Murphy Dilemma

"Daniel Murphy is going to be the Mets version of Rusty Greer and will quickly become a fan favorite for his ability to play the game. Greer's career was cut short by injury, but he averaged .310 20 HR 100 RBI in his prime. I think Mets fans will be very pleased. Of course I said the same about Matt Murton a couple of years back for the Cubs."
I wrote this in a piece after watching Murphy play a couple of games in Atlanta towards the end of the season. I was impressed with Murphy's grit, hustle, and overall baseball IQ. What he lacks in raw talent, he makes up for with hustle and drive. I followed the Greer comparison with,
"Speaking of Murphy, would the Mets be satisfied if he became a similar player to the Braves Kelly Johnson? Johnson started out in the outfield with less initial success than Murphy, but was later successfully transitioned to the infield."
Unfortunately for Mets fans, dreams of Murphy as a second baseman seem shattered as Omar Minaya recently announced the Mets intention of using him as a left fielder with an occasional start at first base to spell Carlos Delgado. What does this mean for Murphy's value? It obviously takes a hit as a potential plus offensive second baseman now becomes a left fielder fighting to be league average.

With Beltran being one of the top offensive center fielders in the game, the Mets can handle one below average offensive corner. However, starting both Ryan Church and Daniel Murphy would be a drag on the offense; made worse by Minaya seemingly putting his faith in both Luis Castillo (3rd worst at second base in 2008) and Brian Schneider (19th ranked catcher in 2008). This is not to say Murphy won't one day be league average or better at the position, but the Mets want to win a World Series now, and I doubt it's possible with the 24th ranked right fielder in baseball and a still developing Murphy.

I appreciate Mets fans having a soft spot for Ryan Church after his stellar start to the 2008 season. Yes, his production took a huge hit post concussion hurting what was looking to be a breakout 2008 campaign. However, nothing in his history other than a couple of prolonged hot streaks point to Church becoming another Ryan Ludwick. As a former 14th round pick, Church was arguably old for the league at every minor league level, developed a bad reputation with his previous organization costing him playing time, and is rumored to be unhappy in New York. A team could do worse than .270/.350/.450 from right field, but can the Mets afford to take a chance on a healthy and productive Church knowing lingering effects from his concussion could still be an issue and Daniel Murphy is no guarantee.

What are the Mets options? Significant upgrades are available, but at a price as only Bobby Abreu is a free agent. Abreu ranked 14th among right fielders in 2008. Below are a few options the Mets should consider through trade who have been rumored as available at one point or another and what it might take to get them. Players are ranked based on perceived value to the Mets versus what it will take to land the player.

Ryan Ludwick - The Cardinals seem to be looking to cash in on Ludwick's monster 2008 as he is rumored to be the centerpiece in a handful of potential trades including a deal to the Braves for Kelly Johnson. While Johnson seems like an awfully small haul for an outfielder with a .299/.375/.591 line, it may indicate an opening the Mets can exploit. Yes Ludwick is thirty and has only one year as a starter under his belt, but the power is real even if his batting average falls back to the .275 range. With him under control for a few more years, he can be had through his prime. The major hitch is the Cardinals and Mets do not make great trade partners with the Cards looking for pitching and major league ready middle infield help. However, the Cardinals do like taking chances on pitchers similar to Heilman and may have an interest in him as a starter.

Potential Package: Jon Niese, Eddie Kunz, 3rd player for Ryan Ludwick

Randy Winn - Surprisingly, Winn ranked 5th among all right fielders in 2008 leaving me scratching my head as to why he hasn't found any suitors as of yet. With a .306/.363/.426 line, twenty-five steals and plus defense, he would be a great fit in the two hole. As an added bonus, he's a free agent after the 2009 season leaving Fernando Martinez and his .346/.388/.564 line in winter ball with a clear path to New York should he break out in 2009 as I expect him to. Call me crazy, but if we can shed Castillo in a package to the Giants, I would even consider bring back Barry Zito if the Giants agreed to eat some of his salary.

Potential Package (No Zito) - Aaron Heilman or Eddie Kunz/Mike Carp for Randy Winn

Potential Package (Inc. Zito) - Eddie Kunz/Mike Carp/Luis Castillo/Ramon Castro for Randy Winn/Barry Zito/eighteen million to bring Zito's annual salary to 9 million.

Franklin Gutierrez - Certainly not a sexy name to discuss in trade talk, but he can be had on the cheap, is already one of the better defensive right fielders in the game and is a player I can see developing along the lines of Mike Cuddyer and contributing a handful of 20+ home run seasons before all is said and done. Gutierrez is a great example of what happens when prospect overhype is mixed with undue organizational pressure causing a player's growth to be stunted. Still only 25, he could prove an asset even in a platoon role with Church as he has hit lefties better than righties in his short career.

Potential Package - Eddie Kunz for Franklin Gutierrez

Of course Bobby Abreu is always an option in right as his consistency and all around game would fit in perfectly into the Mets plans. I do worry about the years being discussed for many of the thirty something free agents available. I can see two to three years for Abreu, but four would be too much for the thirty-four year old Abreu.

Click Here to view Daniel Murphy's career projection.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Boston Red Sox Top 15 Prospects for 2009

After graduating a number of quality major leaguers in the past two years, the Red Sox are in a period of rebuilding their minor league system both internationally and through the amateur draft. The systems strengths are at shortstop and in the outfield as they have drafted or signed a number of talented players at both positions. However, pitching is thin system wide with most being players who came out of nowhere to notoriety within the system.

The lack of production by very young prospects at lower levels made this system a nightmare to grade. While I always rank prospects in terms of production, age versus level, pedigree, and perceived ceiling, pedigree and positional scarcity played more of a role than usual in sorting through this group.

1. Lars Anderson (1B)

The top first base prospect in the game, his .317/.417/.517 line and strong peripherals hint his 2008 output may be the tip of the iceberg. Not only did his production increase significantly from 2007, his strikeout totals also dropped which is a great indicator of natural power growth.

Grade - A-

2. Michael Bowden (SP)

While not a sexy choice for the Sox 2nd best prospect, Bowden's combination of durability and dependability leave him as the winner of the "most likely to succeed" superlative for pitchers in the organization. He's a near lock to become a solid big league #3 with additional room for growth.

Grade - B+

3. Daniel Bard (CL)

Arguably the most dominating reliever in minor league baseball during 2008, Bard's impressive conversion from prospect dud to shut down closer has put him on the fast track to Fenway Park. With Papelbon likely to remain closer for the next few years, Bard could become a dominant eighth inning force and excellent fall back option should Papelbon miss time due to injury.

Grade - B

4. Michael Almanzar (3B)

The gem of the 2007 international free agent class, Almanzar did not disappoint in his U.S. debut. With a .348/.414/.472 GCL debut, an aggressive promotion quickly showed Almanzar's shaky plate discipline. however, at 17 year of age, his power potential and athletic ability makes him a middle of the order threat in an organization short on them.

Grade - B-

5. Casey Kelly (SS/SP)

Kelly struggled in his professional debut, but not at the position many expect him to wind up at. A tremendous athlete, Kelly could have vied for the starting quarterback job for the University of Tennessee as a freshman but a three million dollar signing bonus was just too much to pass up. He will open 2009 as both a pitcher and shortstop making him one of the most dynamic and interesting prospects to watch in all of baseball.

Grade - B-

6. Josh Reddick (OF)

What's not to like about a .311/.356/.544 season over three minor league levels? A .214/.290/.436 in 117 AA at bats is a pretty good answer! At this point, Reddick has proven his worth at lower levels, but has some work to do in order to get over the AA hump. With 2009 being his age 22 season, he still has time, but I worry his baseball background of Savannah area high school ball and a year of Junior College is not the high level of competition of East Cobb or an SEC school and will lead to additional struggles at higher levels.

Grade - B-

7. Stolmy Pimentel (SP)

Another impressive international free agent find, Pimentel has shot up Red Sox prospect charts after a strong U.S. debut. With a potent fastball and arguably the best change up in the system, his future projection and present pitchability could lead to his inclusion on many top 100 prospect lists sooner rather than later and cement him as a top five talent in the organization.

Grade - B-

8. Nick Hagadone (P)

Big, powerful lefties are hard to find and Hagadone fits the mold perfectly. His ranking would be higher if he was true starter material, but the development time lost due to Tommy John surgery makes him a reliever in my mind until he proves otherwise. A Hagadone, Bard, Papelbon led pen would be obscene.

Grade - C+

9. Luis Exposito (C)

With 21 home runs, a .500+ slugging percentage, and stellar defense over two minor league levels, Exposito has cemented himself as the top catching prospect in the organization. Improved plate discipline would improve his stock greatly and earn him consideration as one of the top ten catching prospects in the game.

Grade - C+

10. Ryan Westmoreland (OF)

Signed for a two million dollar bonus as a fifth round pick, Westmoreland instantly became the hit of the Red Sox prospect hype machine. While the talent is definitely present, his price tag seems steep for a non-top 100 draft prospect and cold weather product. From my experience both playing and coaching in Connecticut, Tennessee, and Florida, a .400 average in a place like Rhode Island is equivalent to a .300 average in a hot bed like South Florida.

Grade - C+

11. Yamaico Navarro (INF)

The most complete middle infielder in the Red Sox system, Navarro's combination of defense, hitting ability, and versatility makes him a solid shortstop prospect and a borderline top 10 second base prospect should they slide him over at some point. A jump from the hitter friendly California League to the Eastern League will be a true test of his prospect status.

Grade - C+

12. Kyle Weiland (P)

Weiland opened eyes with his 1.50 ERA, 0.77 WHIP and 10.60 K/9. A reliever in college, his prospect status has skyrocketed now that it appears he will stick in the rotation. Is an aggressive promotion to the Salem in the cards? Continued success could propel him to top five status by this time in 2009.

Grade - C+

13. Ryan Kalish (OF)

An injury plagued 2008 kept Kalish from fulfilling the expectations which come along with a borderline top 100 overall ranking. His .273/.365/.363 line with 19 steals was a disappointment, but he shows the on base skills and speed to still profile as a solid two hole hitter. While he can revitalize his prospect status with a solid 2009, Kalish needs to show the ability to drive the ball.

Grade - C+

14. Oscar Tejeda (INF)

Tools did not translate into production for Tejeda during his first taste of full season ball. However, his .2nd half splits were much improved and his overall line of .261/.301/.347 line at 18 is similar to the numbers put up by Hanley Ramirez (19) and Elvis Andrus (17) in the same league.

Grade - C+

15. Will Middlebrooks (3B)

On raw talent alone, Middlebrooks is a tremendous specimen. However, he disappointed in 2008 with a .254/.298/.368 line in short season ball when many expected him to begin 2008 in Greenville. One key point to bring up about Middlebrooks is if third base doesn't work out, his 90+ MPH heater will likely earn him a second chance on the mound.

Grade - C+

Click here to view the rest of the top 20.

Overall, the top fifteen Sox prospects are young, toolsy, and unproven. Many will dispute my ranking Josh Reddick 6th behind both Almanzar and Kelly, but Reddick's struggles in AA left me underwhelmed and unable to put him ahead of both huge upside talents. I commend the Sox for restocking the system so quickly. Their combining both toolsy international talents with well rounded amateur players is a recipe which many ball clubs will attempt to emulate in the coming years.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Career Projection - Daniel Murphy, OF, NYM

Click here to read "The Daniel Murphy Dilemma" on Metsgeek.com

Daniel Murphy is expected to develop into a catalyst at the top of the New York Mets order. With Omar Minaya announcing the Mets intention of using him as the teams regular left fielder, the question becomes whether or not Murphy will be able to hit enough to warrant his being a regular.

Player comparisons used in the projection included Jose Vidro, Rusty Greer, and Gregg Jefferies, with a quick glance given to both Kevin Seitzer and Mike Greenwell. Unfortunately for Murphy, players similar to him in both style and skill set tend to have success quickly, but fall off the map in their early thirties. Murphy should have a solid career, but it will likely not be a prolonged one.

As for Murphy, is this projection:

1. Right on the money
2. Way off because he will NEVER be that good
3. Conservative since he will have a Hall of Fame career
4. Good, but Murphy will have less impact in his prime.

AGE YR G AB R H 2B 3B HR
23 08 17 131 24 41 9 3 2
24 09 131 481 68 138 27 4 12
25 10 147 539 82 159 36 4 14
26 11 87 319 47 99 22 2 9
27 12 152 558 98 176 38 3 17
28 13 136 499 81 150 31 2 20
29 14 155 569 101 181 34 4 19
30 15 121 444 66 132 29 3 14
31 16 149 547 77 155 32 4 12
32 17 109 400 45 111 23 2 9
33 18 72 224 19 61 13 1 5
Totals 11 1276 4711 708 1403 294 32 133

TB RBI BB K SB AVG OBP SLG OPS
62 17 18 28 0 .313 .397 .473 .871
209 72 49 84 8 .287 .355 .435 .789
245 76 56 80 11 .295 .363 .454 .817
152 44 33 48 7 .310 .375 .476 .851
271 91 62 67 15 .316 .387 .486 .872
245 79 54 60 12 .301 .373 .491 .864
280 98 65 63 17 .318 .388 .492 .881
209 63 48 51 10 .297 .368 .471 .839
231 71 55 74 7 .283 .347 .422 .770
165 41 37 53 3 .277 .338 .412 .750
91 21 20 34 1 .272 .331 .406 .737
2160 673 497 642 91 .298 .369 .458 .828

New York Yankees: 2009 Pitching Staff & Roster

In the second part of his 2009 New York Yankees outlook, Howard Rudolph rebuilds the staff and tallies up the damage.

....and now the pitching staff

SP - C.C. Sabathia:

Sabathia will solidify the rotation and give them a player capable of being a shutdown ace. When you’re scraping Sidney Ponson off your shoe to start, you need to make a lot of moves to your pitching staff.

Prediction – (6 years/147 million)


SP – A.J. Burnett:

Burnett finally put in a healthy season and on a Yankees team and is capable of winning 20 games without any improvement from last year. Without giving up top prospects for Jake Peavy, Burnett is a nice fit here and allows the Yankees to develop their farm system.

Prediction – (5 years/80 million)


SP – Chien-Ming Wang:

Coming off a torn tendon in his foot, having Wang back is like signing a very good free agent pitcher. He will help bring stability back to the rotation if back to full health, which reports are expecting.


SP – Joba Chamberlain:

Durability and injury are concerns, but he has immense potential if he can stay healthy and throw close to 200 innings. Stretching him out over the offseason has to be a top priority.


SP – Randy Johnson/Brad Penny:

Why not? Both Penny and Johnson are risks due to health, but its only a 1 year deal. Johnson is my choice here because he was healthy in 2008 and it would be nice to see him win his 300th as a Yankee. He also didn’t pitch terribly as a Yankee either (winning 17 each year).

Penny is a better choice if healthy because he is only 31, but shoulder tendonitis and soreness scares me. They still have Philip Hughes, Ian Kennedy, or Alfredo Aceves available to start if either breaks down or isn’t productive, but they are better as fall back options for now. I’d like to see them sign Johnson.

Prediction: Randy Johnson - (1 year/8 million)

The Yankees roster would look like this (Players in BOLD indicate new editions):

C – Jorge Posada/ Josh Bard
1B – Mark Teixeira/Nick Swisher
2B – Robinson Can0
3B – Alex Rodriguez
SS – Derek Jeter
LF – xavier Nady/Hideki Matsui
CF – Johnny Damon/Brett Gardner
RF – Nick Swisher/Xavier Nady
DH – Hideki Matsui/Xavier Nady/Nick Swisher
SP – C.C. Sabathia
SP – A. J. Burnett
SP – Chien-Ming Wang
SP – Joba Chamberlain
SP – Randy Johnson/ Philip Hughes/Ian Kennedy/Alfredo Aceves

Major upgrades and at a total spending spree of $77.25 million in salary for 2009, which would lower their payroll from last year. The Evil Empire is back, See ya Carl Pavano!

Click here to read Howard's ideas on the Yankees starting lineup.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Boston Red Sox Top Prospects for 2009 #'s 16-20

Click here to view the top 15 Red Sox prospects

16. Peter Hissey - OF

The third of the Sox million dollar bonus babies, Hissey's game seems similar to that of Kalish in many ways. A .369 OBP and nine steals in just fifteen professional games are a sign of things to come, but he will have to develop some ability to drive the ball as he fills out and matures.

Grade - C+

17. Anthony Rizzo - 1B

Before cancer derailed his 2008 season, Rizzo's .373/.402/.446 line was downright dominating. Now in remission, Rizzo looks to pick up where he left off. With great size and solid all-around hitting chops, he could move quickly for a high school hitting prospect. He would be in the top 10 had he remained healthy.

Grade - C

18. Derrik Gibson - INF

With speed to burn and a superior glove, Gibson's debut in the GCL also showed impressive offensive ability with a .309/.411/.394 line. An aggressive promotion to the New York Penn League proved to be a bit more than Gibson could handle as he struggled mightily bringing down his overall stat line. A full season in Greenville will be an excellent test and a good indicator of what to expect going forward.

Grade - C

19. Che-Hsuan Lin - OF

Lin can play defense and steal bases with the best of them. However, his .249/.342/.359 line brings into question his offensive ceiling and whether he will be more than defensive whiz out of the nine hole.

Grade - C

20. Argenis Diaz - SS

The best defensive shortstop in the organization, Diaz' .284/.332/.382 line leaves him as yet another glove heavy prospect. In trying to find a major league regular with similar minor league numbers, I could not find one with a combination of little pop and stolen base ability. I'm still looking....

Grade - C

My one concern is the organization drafting so many high school talents from cold weather climates to big signing bonuses. Westmoreland, Hissey, and Gibson seem like pretty significant risks considering Casey Kelly and Anthony Rizzo likely faced much stiffer competition as high school players leaving them more prepared for professional baseball.

New York Yankees: 2009 Projected Starting Lineup

Howard Rudolph breaks down what he feels should be the Yankees off season plans. Part one examines the projected starting lineup including possible trades and free agent signings.

The New York Yankees, a/k/a Evil Empire (my favorite team) can afford to do, say, and buy whomever they please. With 80 million coming off the books this off season and the opening of a new stadium adding to revenue, they are poised to sign the top talents in free agency.

This is the most important off season for the Yankees in years; they could rebuild the franchise to its prior glory or run it into the ground reminiscent of most of the 1980’s. They have young talent in the minors who look promising and Brian Cashman has shown patience. Can Cashman afford to wait and pass up Jake Peavy as he did last year with Johan Santana?

Gone is approximately 80 million from the books. a few players leaving are addition by subtraction, but others will need to have their production replaced. For all his knocks, Jason Giambi produced a line of .247/.373/.502 with 32 HR and 96 RBI. Pettitte is contemplating retirement, and Mussina has already retired, but both were productive. The Yankees should move on to younger and better players, but it’s not that easy.

Already added to the fold is 1B/OF Nick Swisher, who will add versatility. I’m not willing to assume that Swisher is the Yankees every day first baseman and see him rotating between 1B, OF and DH as injuries dictate. The Yankees need 2-3 starting pitchers, a first baseman and backup catcher. Here is a position by position breakdown and who I think they will sign:

C – Jorge Posada:

A shoulder injury can’t be good for a catcher and the Yankees need to be prepared if he is unable catch next year. At 37, he is supposed to be healthy and ready to catch, but things don’t always go as planned. The free agent list doesn’t contain any viable long term options, with no one under age 31. The Yankees have Austin Romine in the wings, but he is 3-4 years away. Jose Molina is a good defensive catcher, but can’t hit his way out of a paper bag and the Yankees need to address this. I can see a trade with the Rangers for Gerald Laird as a temporary fix but predict they sign Josh Bard.

Prediction – Josh Bard (2 years/5.5 million)

1B – Mark Teixeira/Nick Swisher:

If the Yankees want to improve from last year, Mark Teixeira is the option here. Tex brings it all, offense and gold glove caliber defense. Swisher had a down year in 2008 and would need a substantial rebound to produce what Jason Giambi did last year. If they are in a trading mood, a long shot I think would be a good fit is Garrett Atkins of the Rockies. Atkins can play first and third in the event of an injury to A-Rod or Jeter (A-Rod slide to SS if Jeter is hurt). Atkins would likely cost the Yankees at least two good prospects. He hit a poor .233/.278/.383 away from Coors field last year. However, his road BABIP was low at .255 so there's a chance for substantial improvement next year from Atkins, I predict the Yankees sign Teixeira.

Prediction: Mark Teixeira (6 years/156 million)

2B – Robinson Cano:

Young and cost controlled, two things the Yankees aren’t known for. His post all-star game numbers were .307/.333/.482. Leave him alone and let him play.

SS – Derek Jeter:

Another year, another .300 season. OBP and SLG have gone down two years in a row now and his defensive range is not good. Is there a potential move to first base or center field in the future?? The Yankees have to start thinking about a replacement, but not this year.

3B – Alex Rodriguez:

I don’t think anything needs to be said here.

LF – Xavier Nady/Hideki Matsui:

Nady had 25 HR and 97 RBI for Pitt and NY last year. Knee surgery limited Matsui to 93 games. His production was down, but when healthy he has produced. I’d start Nady in left and insert Matsui when Nady needs a day off or is at DH.

CF – Johnny Damon:

Old and broken down comes to mind for the 35 year old but his stats show .303/.375/.461 with 29 SB. Stick him in center next year and rotate him at DH with the occasional day off. They have plenty of interchangeable parts in the outfield to move around. Brett Gardner/Melky Cabrera are capable temporary fill ins if Damon gets hurt.

RF – Nick Swisher/Xavier Nady:

When Nady is in left, Swisher should man right. When Matsui is starting in left, Swisher should be at first or DH.

DH – Hideki Matsui/Xavier Nady/Nick Swisher:

Whoever isn’t in left and right should be the DH. A rotating schedule should help keep all three fresh and healthy, but I can see Matsui as the DH the majority of the time because of his knee Problems.


Click here to view Howard's pitching staff projection.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Are Mets Prospects Overhyped?

Let's start by taking Mets fans off of the defensive by acknowledging Mets prospects are certainly not the most over hyped in major league baseball. However, the hype machine does work overtime for the Mets often making it difficult for die hard Mets fans to recognize where their prospects fit into the big picture.

In my time writing for Metsgeek, I've seen a number of posters throw out trades like Bobby Parnell and Eddie Kunz for Jake Peavy while labeling prospects like Jon Niese and Daniel Murphy untouchable. While I appreciate the fervor in which Mets fans support their team, I sometimes wonder how certain prospects become so overvalued in the eyes of their fans.

When assessing the potential for players being over hyped, one often needs to look no further than the size of the media market. A sub category of this is how many teams are in a particular city and where each ranks in popularity. Additionally, organizational success breeds fan support and is another contributing factor. Based on this, my top five organizations in terms of potential for hype are:
  1. New York Yankees
  2. Los Angeles Dodgers
  3. Boston Red Sox
  4. New York Mets
  5. Chicago Cubs
These organizations have the largest fan bases and therefore garner the most significant media attention. For those of you who read prospect chats, the following should be all too familiar:

Host: Welcome to the chat. Fire away!
NYFan1: Who is the top prospect in the Mets organization?
Host: Fernando Martinez or Wilmer Flores
SoxFan: Is Michael Almanzar better than Wilmer Flores?
Host: No.
DodgerBlue: Is Kershaw the top young pitcher in baseball?
Host: Yes. Better than Price!
YanksH8R: F-Mart or Austin Jackson?
Host: F-Mart
MetsKing: Is Jon Niese going to be in the Mets ro?
Host: Maybe, if they don't sign anybody.
GoYanks: Is Ian Kennedy going to be in the Yanks ro?
Host: Aceves has jumped him on the depth chart.
Lonely Royal: What is Mike Montgomery's ceiling?
Host: Solid #2. Stock has risen.

With the sheer number of fans from the big market franchises, they tend to dominate the conversation with a number of very similar questions asked different ways. Hosts even make comments about how often the same question is asked in the hope fans will get the point. With the conversation driven in ways similar to the chat above, it's only natural for prospects from major media markets to rise in name recognition. That name recognition leads to hype when the players output does not equal the buzz surrounding them.

Bobby Parnell is a perfect example of this. I've seen his name on many Mets fans top five prospect lists and his names comes up frequently on prospect chats. Meanwhile, his 4.62 ERA, average strikeout totals and more than a hit per inning allowed is the epitome of average.

The media also plays a huge role in they hype machine. A poster on Metsgeek was correct in bashing the media for their impatience with Mets prospects. The question I ask is where does the impatience come from? My answer would be from prospects being mentioned so many times starting at a young age they are expected to produce MVP or Cy Young type numbers from day one. This is especially dangerous since I doubt reporters covering the Mets have the prospect knowledge of many well read Mets bloggers and fans. When time to research prospects is limited due to commitments to writing about the big club, writers tend to focus too much on raw numbers which can create a warped view of the prospects true value (see Mike Carp).

I'm confident Lastings Milledge will be an all-star caliber player before all is said and done. In all honestly, 2008 should have been his rookie season. Had it been, he would have finished in the top five in rookie of the year balloting and would be entering 2009 as the new toast of New York and the best African-American player since Straw and Doc. Instead, he'll be a cornerstone in the Nationals rise to respectability and was dealt for a song as a fall guy for the Mets 2007 collapse.

As an aspiring writer and blogger, I find myself a guilty party in making the hype machine worse, not better. On Baseball Handyman, 25 of 86 posts are about the Mets and Yankees. An additional eleven feature the Braves, another franchise whose prospects sometimes receive undue hype (think Kyle Davies). Meanwhile I make one mention of the Nationals, Indians, and Mariners.

With that said, I guess prospect hype is cyclical. Writers want readers so they write about franchises who have the most fans. Fans obviously want to discuss their own players so they ask questions about their teams prospects. The teams with the most fans has the most questions asked and the cycle repeats.

What Mets fans can do is look at their own prospects with the understanding their opinion of a player is likely 10-20% more generous than a non-fan's would be. This will help temper expectations and keep perceived trade values in the realm of realistic. It will also help many a Mets fan keep from sounding silly the next time the temptation to offer up Bobby Parnell/Mike Carp/Josh Thole for B.J. Upton around the water cooler gets them laughed out of the building.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Where Will Peavy Play in 2009? - v. Howard Rudolph

Howard Rudolph pops his cherry with his first solo piece for the site as he chimes in on the Jake Peavy proceedings in his version of Where Will Peavy Play in 2009?

Jake Peavy been rumored in deals to many of the teams on his five team wish list, teams not on his trade list and probably some teams in the Japanese league. Most have been completely dismissed, with the Braves reportedly scared off by the asking price and the Cubs lacking the pitching prospects it would take. Other teams deny interest in an excellent pitcher with a below market value contract. Posturing? Of course! You can pretty much dismiss all of Kevin Tower’s (or any General Manager's) comments on trades. They aren’t going to tip their hands or try to appear in a rush to make a deal.

Who has what it takes to land Jake Peavy? With Peavy’s list of preferred landing spots (Braves, Cubs, Dodgers, Cardinals and Astros), and the inclusion of the Yankees and Angels, here is my opinion of what it would take for the team to land Peavy and why or why not it’s a good idea.

Braves: They have the prospects and the willingness to deal for Peavy and the Padres seem interested. Not being willing to deal an elite prospect could cost the Braves Peavy’s services and dealing Yunell Escobar will open a hole at shortstop they cannot fill without spending in free agency. However, if they sign Rafael Furcal, Escobar becomes expendable. I’d offer Yunell Escobar, Gorkys Hernandez (OF), Cole Rohrbough (P), and Jeff Locke (P) (who the Padres were rumored to be interested in). It still might not be enough to land Peavy, but adding Hanson would be too much. Better hurry, the A’s are hot for Furcal.

Cubs: What exactly are the Cubs thinking? Maybe if they knew what they were thinking, it wouldn’t be 100 years since their last World Championship. Peavy is a luxury for a team that already has a starting rotation of Carlos Zambrano, Rich Harden, Ted Lilly and Ryan Dempster. They could still go after A.J. Burnett or Derek Lowe in free agency, rounding out a very solid pitching staff without gutting the remaining prospects in their minor league system. It would take a 3rd team and Josh Vitters (3B) to get a deal done and give the Padres the pitching prospects they are looking for. I can’t see the Padres settling for mediocre Cubs prospects and don’t see them as a good fit at all.

Dodgers: A team loaded with pitching prospects, have a glut of outfielders and an expendable shortstop prospect. If they re-sign Manny Ramirez, a deal involving either Matt Kemp or Andre Ethier and James McDonald (P), Chin-Lung Hu (SS) and maybe even Chris Withrow (P). It could make the Padres bite, but does this make sense for the Dodgers? I see Peavy as a really good fit here and if they can get him without giving up Ethier or Kemp I think they should be aggressive and do what it takes to land Peavy. If they let Manny walk and sign C.C. Sabathia, all bets are off.

Cardinals: Excess in the outfield and the willingness to sell high on Ryan Ludwick makes the Cardinals a wild card in my mind. Why they want to deal a player that hit .299/.375/.591 with 37 homers and 113 RBI last year is beyond me, but he’s thirty so the Cards may be thinking they’ve seen the best of him. I’m sure the Padres would rather have Colby Rasmus, but I like a lot of things I won’t get either. Is a package of OF Ludwick, Jaime Garcia (P), Jesse Todd (P), and Jose Martinez (SS) too much? Too little? Just right?

Astros: They do not have the prospects nor players it will take to land Peavy. Felipe Paulino? Bud Norris? Please. What good would dealing Hunter Pence (plus others) do the Astros when their other current outfield options are Darren Erstad, Reggie Abercrombie and Bourn….Michael Bourn?

Angels: They definitely have what it takes to land Peavy, but is pitching the area they need to address? Holes in the infield are a bigger priority, but this isn’t about that. A deal is reasonable and the ideal situation for the Padres and Peavy.

Scenario 1: Ervin Santana, Sean Rodriguez (INF), Reggie Willits (OF), and a lesser pitching prospect.

Scenario 2: Brandon Wood (SS), Nick Adenhart (P), Erik Aybar (INF), and a lesser pitching prospect. I wouldn’t rule out a combination of these players being mixed and matched if Peavy does end up in Anaheim.

Yankees: SO much money and the prospects to deal if they really want. Brian Cashman has shown the restraint in not trading his young talent so far, but the Yankees didn’t make the playoffs for the first time in over a decade. Will the temptation lead Cashman to let go of Ian Kennedy and others? I would deal Kennedy to land Peavy, but only if Peavy didn’t require a market value contract adjustment to waive his no trade clause to the Yankees.

Peavy + top prospects + 20mil+ a year contract = bad move for the Yankees.

They could sign A.J. Burnett for roughly sixteen million a year as a better option. The Yankees are going to score a lot of runs no matter who pitches for them and Burnett could very well win 20 games for them. Assuming no market value contract adjustment for Peavy, a deal of Ian Kennedy, George Kontos (P), Austin Romine (C), and Melky Cabrera could pique the Padres interest. Or would it?

Ranking the teams in order of the best deal for the Padres and fit for a trade between teams, it would be: Angels, Braves, Dodgers, Yankees, Cardinals, Cubs and Astros. That said, my guess is that Peavy ends up as a member of the Atlanta Braves.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Congrats Ryan Dempster!

Ryan Dempster has always been one of my favorite pitchers. Why you might ask? It's not because of his ability. When Dempster was an up and coming pitcher with the Marlins, I was completing an internship for college graduation with the local Miami ABC station. On a busy day, I was sent to Pro Player with press credential in hand to stick a microphone in Dempster's face after he threw eight shutout innings in what had been the best performance of his young career.

Standing in front of his locker with a bunch of reporters throwing out questions was an exciting experience, even though I didn't get up the nerve to actually ask a question. It was surreal seeing Preston Wilson and Luis Castillo moving around the locker room. When watching them on the field, one starts to forget they are only human.

Dempster was gracious and a very personable guy at that point in his career. His sense of humor was also on full display in his locker as a 8 x 11 of Stone Cold Steve Austin graced his locker along with a very cool autographed baseball. Who autographed the ball you might ask? None other than the great "actor" Peter North (ha ha ha).

While I'm not sure the Cubs will receive their money's worth, Dempster certainly did pick the right time to have a career year. He has found a home in Chicago and it's always great to see former Marlins find the grass really is greener after to having to deal with the half-assed ownership which has plagued the franchise for a decade.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Don't Forget About Me! - Chris Withrow, P, LAD

When I inherited my latest fantasy baseball team prior to the 2008 season, Chris Withrow was one of the best minors hold overs from a god awful bunch. I held on as long as I could, but had to drop him halfway through the season to make room for 2008 draft picks. With 2009 around the corner, Withrow is a forgotten about prospect who should be on watch lists in your league, but likely is not.

A former first round pick, Withrow missed almost all of the 2008 season with injuries including a serious cut from a scuba diving accident and a tender elbow. When he returned in August, he struggled in the hitter friendly California League in very limited action. In only four innings pitched, he struck out one and walked six. A disturbing line even given the microscopic sample size.

Entering his second full season, his having only fifteen professional innings under his belt has made him a true wild card within the Dodgers organization. He still has a number of things going for him though including good size and a fastball which bordered on overpowering before missing so much of 2008.

2009 will be a huge season for Withrow in terms of development and determining whether his future projection remains as a starter. At 20, his inexperience and spotty breaking stuff might force him to the bullpen long term if he's unable to make up for lost time. Keep him on your radar especially in deep leagues. Arms like his aren't usually around for the taking and I would take a chance on Withrow before the soft tossing control artists who are likely available.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Stud or Dud? - Fernando Martinez, OF, NYM

As per usual with "Stud or Dud?" pieces appearing on baseballhandyman.com, credit Howard Rudolph with an assist in his Metsgeek.com debut by contributing the "dud" portion of the piece.

F-Mart was the unquestionable gem of the Mets system during both the 2006 and 2007 seasons. An international free agent who signed for 1.4 million, the bar has been set phenomenally high from day one. Entering 2008, his average prospect ranking of 25.25 earned him a spot as one of the best prospects in all of baseball. However, injuries limited Martinez to ninety games once again costing him valuable development time. His 2006 and 2007 seasons were both shortened due to injury as well.

Martinez enters 2009 sharing the Mets prospect spotlight with Wilmer Flores and even ranked 2nd behind him on my 2009 Mets top prospect list. His overall prospect ranking will undoubtedly drop until he shows both durability and improved power production. Unnecessarily rushed through the Mets organization, a repeat of AA at 20 might be just what Martinez needs to really break out in a big way.

Stud?


In a future piece for my blog, Martinez will be included as a prospect primed for a big season who may be available in deep dynasty leagues at a discount. F-Mart, like so many other international free agents has been slow to show the 25-30 home run power projection he is expected to produce. Many forget his being just 19 and focus solely on his .281/.338/.429 career stat line.

With that said, his 2008 line of .287/.340/.432 is quite impressive for a teenager in AA. In comparison, here's what other Mets stars were doing at the same age.

Carlos Beltran - .249/.332/.393 in both A- and A+
Carlos Delgado - .286/.397/.458 in A- (0-3 in A+ not included)
Jose Reyes - .307/.336/.472 in A-
David Wright - .266/.364/.401 in A-

Not only is Martinez a level or two ahead of the Mets uber-talented core at the same age, but his numbers are arguably more impressive as well. With AA being the true make or break level for most prospects, anything accomplished in A- ball has to be taken with a grain of salt.

Other metrics also point towards future success. His 20.7 K% and 7.3 BB% show a need for improvement, but also indicate his not being overwhelmed by advanced pitching. His BABIP of .343 was a little high, but nothing that would set off alarm bells either. Historically, the international prospects who fail miserable at the big league level are players who display a complete lack of plate discipline. F-Mart definitely does not fit this profile.

The argument over F-Mart basically comes down to one thing; Age versus level. Depending on how big a factor it is in each person's mind will determine where F-Mart fits in. Since it is the first thing I consider when looking at prospects, I can not justify an overall drop in prospect ranking beyond the mid to low 30's. I also look at his keeping his head above water in AA after only 120 or so games as a pro and am left shaking my head in disbelief.

With that said, the Mets need to make better decisions on how to handle Martinez from 2009 on. My time line for Martinez would look like this.

2009 - AA 1st half, AAA promotion depends on health and success. Martinez needs to dominate somewhere and should remain in AA until he does.

2010 - AAA until September with a possible call up when rosters expand. This would be the absolute earliest the Mets should even consider giving him a taste of the bigs.

2011 - Opportunity to win a corner outfield spot in spring training. Log consistent at bats in AAA until he's ready to play everyday in New York. F-Mart is too good a prospect to log bench time at the big league level.


Dud?


I must admit I did not know much about Fernando Martinez before I started this piece, other than his being both a very highly ranked and hyped prospect. He's the consensus Mets #1 prospect, so I just assumed he had the statistics to back that up. You know the saying when you assume and this is certainly the case here. I looked at his stats and the first thing that came to mind was "WHAT AM I MISSING HERE?" I understand his being 19 years old and in AA last season, which is almost unheard of. I also understand his status as the Mets top prospect, which automatically makes him over hyped. An APR (Average Prospect Ranking) of around 25th overall says he's one of the top prospects in baseball, but why?

It's easy to see by looking at his statistics that the Mets are rushing him through the minors. Imagine that, the Mets rushing a prospect. Why do the Mets insist on letting F-Mart tread water at higher levels instead of tearing up easier levels prior to promoting when ready to tear up the next level? There's no doubt F-Mart has the potential to be a star, so why risk rushing him and stunting his development?

F-Mart has also been hampered by injuries. He's had the Hamate bone removed in his wrist in 2007 and a bad hamstring in 2008 which cost him significant playing time. He's missed the equivalent of a full seasons worth of at-bats in three years as a pro.

Statistically, between 2007 and 2008 in AA Binghamton, Martinez has put up a line of .278/.337/.408 (.745 OPS) in 588 AB with 12 homers, 64 RBI, a K/BB ratio of 124/47 and 9 stolen bases. Other than the Sally league in 2006, he hasn't been on base more than the .340 OBP he posted last year in AA (the 14 at bat rookie league stint last year excluded). He doesn't walk much, just 69 times in 926 at bats (7.4%), so plate discipline is a concern. Is this really one of the top 25 prospects in the game?

Other than his age, there's nothing to me which stands out and says "he's got All-Star written all over him!" To me, that's what a top 25 prospect signifies. Where is the production to lead one to believe he could be a future all-star? He doesn't steal bases, doesn't have much power, doesn't make great contact, doesn't get on base that much or walk much at all. For all of you screaming at your monitor and/or cursing at me that he's ONLY 20 (as of Oct 10) and has all of the potential to be a superstar player, I agree. I will be looking forward to seeing whether he turns that potential into production, but as of right now I can't see any justification for him being a top 25 prospect.

Click here to view what Fernando Martinez' career line could look like.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Career Projection - Fernando Martinez, OF, NYM

To accompany the "Stud or Dud?" article appearing on Friday at Metsgeek.com, I figured why not take a stab at a career projection for F-Mart. Creating the following projection actually took longer than writing the piece and was pretty labor intensive. With that said, I'd love to hear what readers think to help me determine whether or not it is a useful tool, or waste of time.

As for F-Mart, is this projection:

1. Right on the money
2. Way off because he will NEVER be that good
3. Conservative since he will have a Hall of Fame career
4. Good, but F-Mart will have less impact in his prime.

YR G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB
10 17 49 7 11 2 0 1 5 3 14 1
11 124 410 51 110 22 3 9 54 28 86 5
12 136 476 58 134 25 3 11 60 40 90 7
13 154 539 66 158 28 4 15 72 49 94 9
14 92 322 46 101 20 2 9 42 32 55 6
15 152 532 81 171 34 5 18 89 53 80 11
16 148 518 84 160 36 4 21 82 50 78 9
17 156 593 101 194 42 3 26 106 58 89 13
18 137 507 87 161 33 2 22 90 49 70 9
19 155 589 102 188 32 3 31 111 61 102 10
20 151 574 98 171 35 2 26 103 53 97 8
21 76 289 42 80 16 1 12 45 26 55 4
22 132 502 83 148 29 3 19 86 44 88 6
23 147 559 89 157 31 2 20 92 51 97 5
24 128 474 72 131 24 1 17 78 43 89 3
25 111 389 47 100 19 1 13 51 34 74 2
26 53 155 17 35 9 0 4 15 12 31 0
17 2069 7477 1131 2210 437 39 274 1181 686 1289 108

AVG OBP SLG OPS
.224 .269 .327 .596
.268 .320 .402 .722
.282 .342 .416 .758
.293 .354 .443 .798
.314 .377 .472 .850
.321 .386 .506 .892
.309 .376 .515 .892
.327 .390 .540 .930
.318 .382 .521 .903
.319 .386 .542 .928
.298 .359 .502 .861
.277 .337 .464 .800
.295 .358 .478 .836
.281 .345 .451 .796
.276 .339 .439 .778
.257 .318 .411 .730
.226 .281 .361 .643
.296 .358 .474 .833